International Financial & Economic Crime · Money Laundering

International Money Laundering Defense

Facing a money laundering investigation, or worried an account freeze signals one? Our network includes a licensed lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction.

Direct answer: money laundering allegations typically follow a three-stage framework authorities look for — placement, layering, and integration — and a case can span more than one country if the funds moved across borders. Most statutes also require an underlying “predicate offence,” even if that offence is never separately charged.

How We Work

Local Counsel, Coordinated for You

Global Lawyers Link is an international legal referral and coordination network, not a law firm licensed in any single jurisdiction.

Our network includes licensed lawyers in the relevant jurisdiction for your matter, working together on strategy from day one. Representation before any court is always handled directly by the network lawyer admitted to practice there.

How Cases Develop

How Money Laundering Cases Develop

These cases often begin quietly, well before any formal charge is filed.

01

Placement, Layering, Integration

Authorities typically frame the alleged conduct around these three stages of moving and disguising funds.

02

Suspicious Activity Reports

Many cases begin with a report filed by a bank or financial institution, often without the account holder’s knowledge.

03

Predicate Offence Requirement

Laundering charges generally require an underlying crime to exist, even where that offence is never separately prosecuted.

04

Cross-Border Account Freezes

Accounts can be frozen in more than one country while an investigation is still at an early stage.

Defense Considerations

Common Defense Considerations

Money laundering statutes vary, but several themes recur across most jurisdictions.

  • 01
    Knowledge & IntentMany statutes require proving the person knew or suspected the funds’ illicit origin, not merely that the funds were connected to a crime.
  • 02
    Legitimate Source DefenseDemonstrating funds are lawfully derived can directly answer the core allegation.
  • 03
    Procedural ChallengesHow accounts were frozen or evidence obtained can itself be challenged, particularly across jurisdictions with different standards.
  • 04
    Predicate Offence DisputesWhere the underlying predicate offence is weak or unproven, the laundering charge itself can be vulnerable.

Dealing With Money Laundering?

Tell us what you know so far. We will confirm what applies and bring in the right network lawyer — in confidence.

Contact Us
Frequently Asked

Common Questions

Can my account be frozen without me being charged?

Yes — account freezes often occur at the investigation stage, well before any formal charge is filed.

What is a predicate offence?

It is the underlying crime that generated the funds in question — most money laundering charges require one to exist, even if it is prosecuted separately or not at all.

Do I need to prove where my money came from?

In some proceedings, particularly civil recovery actions, the burden can shift to the account holder to show a legitimate source for the funds.

Can a money laundering investigation span multiple countries?

Yes, particularly where funds moved through accounts or intermediaries in more than one jurisdiction.

Contact Us for a Confidential Case Review

Tell us what you know so far and any documents you have received. We will respond directly and confidentially, and bring in the right network lawyer if representation is needed.

Call +30 697 027 1489